William Selko v. Home Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding attorney’s subjective beliefs were irrelevant at the second, objective prong
• quoting, inter alia, Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. Am. Empire Ins. Co., 469 A.2d 563, 566 (Pa. 1983)
• describing how attorney misappropriated client funds to invest in attorney's private real estate ventures
• upholding prior knowledge provision which provided coverage for acts, errors, or omissions so long as the “Insured had no basis to believe that the Insured had breached a professional duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).