William Schorsch, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-Petitioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relation back with respect to the addition of a new claim is to be decided under state law
• explaining that despite plaintiff’s expansion of the class definition “[t]his is still just one suit, between the original litigants. Litigants and judges regularly modify class definitions”
• considering whether a change to scope of class in state court “commenced” a new suit for purposes of removability under the Class Action Fairness Act
• considering whether a change to scope of class in state court “commenced” a new suit for purposes of removability under the Class Action Fairness Act
• noting that “[l]itigants and judges regularly modify class definitions”
• noting that ‘[l]itigants and judges regularly modify class definitions’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).