William Schechner v. Kpix-Tv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee can establish a prima facie age discrimination case with evidence that his or her replacement was substantially younger with equal or inferior qualifications
• applying inference where plaintiff was offered an employment contract less than 6 two years prior to being laid off
• applying the same-actor inference 24 1 on summary judgment after finding that the employer had “signed [the employees] to new 2 contracts not long before they [were] laid off.”
• “The inference . . . may arise 12 when the favorable action and termination are as much as a few years apart.”
• “California applies the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting 18 framework and other federal employment law principles when 19 interpreting the FEHA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).