William Rosenstein & Sons Co. v. BBI Produce, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s .04%—.05% of product sales was not sufficient to put the defendant on notice that it might be haled into court in Pennsylvania, where the tort occurred outside the forum
• denying a plaintiff’s request for jurisdictional discovery where the plaintiff failed to “explain[] what it wishes to discover and how this would help overcome the great weight of evidence supporting a finding that this court lacks jurisdiction.”
• “While it is true that a plaintiff should be allowed discovery of relevant jurisdictional facts, Rosenstein has not made a proffer explaining what it wishes to discover 26 . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).