William Riley v. K Mart Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he jury’s first answers could be viewed as consistent, by reading them as saying that Riley suffered $250,000 in damages from the fall but that [Kmart] was only 30% responsible and therefore not under a legal duty to compensate Riley .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).