Skip to main content
· 4/18/1983

William REED, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and United Auto Workers, Local Union 276, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 703 F.2d 170
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 287
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28742
  • 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,538
  • 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while total number of objectors is not dispositive, it is one factor that courts should consider in conducting a fairness evaluation
  • affirming the district court’s approval of a settlement despite “the objections of twenty-three of twenty-seven named plaintiffs and nearly forty percent of the 1,517 member class”
  • approving settlement “over the objections of twenty-three of twenty-seven named plaintiffs and nearly forty percent of the 1,517 member class”
  • upholding a settlement approval over the objections of 23 out of the 27 named plaintiffs
  • recognizing the court is not to try the case
  • “The very purpose of [a class action] compromise is to avoid the delay and expense of ... trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randall, Higginbotham, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.