· 4/18/1983
William REED, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and United Auto Workers, Local Union 276, Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 703 F.2d 170
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 287
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28742
- 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,538
- 32 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that while total number of objectors is not dispositive, it is one factor that courts should consider in conducting a fairness evaluation
- affirming the district court’s approval of a settlement despite “the objections of twenty-three of twenty-seven named plaintiffs and nearly forty percent of the 1,517 member class”
- approving settlement “over the objections of twenty-three of twenty-seven named plaintiffs and nearly forty percent of the 1,517 member class”
- upholding a settlement approval over the objections of 23 out of the 27 named plaintiffs
- recognizing the court is not to try the case
- “The very purpose of [a class action] compromise is to avoid the delay and expense of ... trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Higginbotham, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.