William Raymond Klingele v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry Amos Reed Larry Kincheloe Tana Wood Mr. Gleason James Thatcher Mr. McClean

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth standard of review and noting that “[t]he burden is on the nonmoving party ... to show what material facts would be discovered that would preclude summary judgment”
• setting forth standard of review and recognizing that “[t]he burden is on the nonmoving party ... to show what material facts would be discovered that would preclude summary judgment”
• setting forth standard of review and recognizing that “[t]he burden is on the nonmoving party ... to show what material facts would be discovered that would preclude summary judgment”
• setting forth standard of review and recognizing that “[t]he burden is on the nonmoving party . . . to show what material facts would be discovered that would preclude summary judgment”
• setting forth standard of review and recognizing that “[t]he burden is on the nonmoving party . . . to show what material facts would be discovered that would preclude summary judgment”
• non-moving party satisfied the burden by setting forth 10 the particular facts expected to be uncovered through discovery, and identifying specific facts 11 tending to show that the evidence sought actually exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).