Skip to main content
· 1/11/1995

William RAINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 1355
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 466
  • 1995 WL 8233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that the area of social security law cannot in itself be considered such a specialized area of law practice as to warrant, as a general' rule, payment in excess of the [statutory] rate”
  • declining to find that Social Security expertise was needed for the claim before the court
  • “[T]he area of social security law cannot in itself be considered such a specialized area of law practice as to warrant, as a general rule, payment in excess of the [statutory] rate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Meskill, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.