William R. Schwartzman, M.D. v. Fred Valenzuela Bamford Frankland, David Swoap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding retaliation where an employer terminated an employee three years after the employee began openly criticizing the department
• finding retaliation where an employer terminated an employee three years after the employee began openly criticizing the department
• affirming the denial of summary judgment for employer because, in addition to producing evidence that his employer knew of his speech, the plaintiff produced a memorandum from his employer \warning him that he was not authorized to speak out\
• affirming the denial of summary judgment for employer because, in addition to producing evidence that his employer knew of his speech, the plaintiff produced a memorandum from his employer “warning him that he was not authorized to speak out”
• affirming the denial of summary judgment for employer because, in addi tion to producing evidence that his employer knew of his speech, the plaintiff produced a memorandum from his employer “warning him that he was not authorized to speak out”
• affirming the denial of summary judgment for employer because, in addition to producing evidence that his employer knew of his speech, the plaintiff produced a memorandum from his employer \warning him that he was not authorized to speak out\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).