Skip to main content
· 7/28/1995

William R. Murphy v. Keystone Steel & Wire Company

Citations

  • 61 F.3d 560
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 317
  • 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2980
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court “cannot” interpret a CBA provision such that the provision “would be rendered meaningless or superfluous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.