William R. Milburn and Richard v. Thompson v. The United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 10-day notice was required even though moving party characterized its motion as one to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment
• stating a district court granting summary judgment under Rule 56 is not required to conduct an oral hearing
• \Consideration of matters beyond the complaint is improper in the context of a motion to dismiss....\
• “Consideration of matters beyond the complaint is improper in the context of a motion to dismiss but proper in the context of a motion for summary judgment.”
• “Consideration of matters beyond the complaint is improper in the context of a motion to dismiss[.]”
• “[T]he court converts a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment by considering matters beyond the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).