William R. Johnson v. Beatrice Foods Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Tenth Circuit “has specifically held that claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress are preempted by section 301”
• intentional infliction of emotional distress not pre-empted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).