Skip to main content
· 5/24/2001

William R. Haulbrook v. Michelin North America,incorporated Michelin Americas Research & Development Corporation

Citations

  • 252 F.3d 696
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1407
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 10699
  • 2001 WL 558152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that that a request for a reasonable accommodation constitutes protected activity for purposes of a retaliation claim
  • holding that an accommodation request constitutes protected activity that may sustain a retaliation claim
  • holding that an accommodation request constitutes protected activity that may sustain a retaliation claim
  • holding that an eleven-day lapse between an accommodation request and termination established causation
  • holding that an eleven-day lapse between an accommodation request and termination established causation
  • holding that a request for reasonable accommodation constitutes “protected activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Motz, Hilton, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.