Skip to main content
· 5/13/1991

William Paul Lakeman, Sr., as Administrator of the Estate of Donald Eugene Lakeman, Deceased v. Otis Elevator Company, Ppg Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 1547
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1255
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9301
  • 1991 WL 63743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony on matters not noticed where the appellant’s trial counsel was “well versed” in those matters and “capable of cross-examining [the experts] effectively”
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony on matters not disclosed where the opposing party’s counsel was “well versed” in those matters and “capable of cross-examining [the experts] effectively”
  • upholding a district court’s ruling that expert testimony was admissible where the party failed to disclose the intended use of its expert witness because defense counsel was well-versed and capable of cross-examining the experts effectively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Clark, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.