WILLIAM PATRICK BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that replacement of unpatented filter cartridge was not infringement of patent on filter unit of which cartridge was a component
• affirming plaintiff's position that only replacement of spent parts constitutes repair and not reconstruction
• “[T]here can be neither con- tributory nor induced infringement when, because of the permissible repair doctrine, there has been no direct infringement.”
• replacement of entire cartridge containing spent filter is repair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).