William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, in No. 98-1636 William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, William P. Becker, in No. 98-1888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s alleged fabrication concerning an employee was not admissible as habit evidence
• considering and rejecting a harmless error argument raised for the first time by the appellee at oral argument and only then countered by the appellant
• considering and rejecting a harmless error argument raised for the first time by the appellee at oral argument and only then countered by the appellant
• examining when evidence may be admitted to prove a plan or scheme under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b)(2)
• citing, inter alia, Fed. R. Evid. 103(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 61
• independently reviewing trial court's denial of evidentiary objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).