· 1/11/1991
William N. Ernzen and Helen C. Ernzen v. United States
Citations
- 922 F.2d 1433
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 520
- 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1419
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 347
- 67 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 453
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 260
- 1991 WL 1198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing technical statutory definition of “contribution” in 26 U.S.C. § 72(r)
- interpretation of whether nontaxable “contributions” included income tax paid on plaintiffs’ benefits limited to whether plaintiffs had received benefits equivalent to “their contributions to the Railroad Retirement Account.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norris, Hall, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.