Skip to main content
· 1/11/1991

William N. Ernzen and Helen C. Ernzen v. United States

Citations

  • 922 F.2d 1433
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 520
  • 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1419
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 347
  • 67 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 453
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 260
  • 1991 WL 1198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing technical statutory definition of “contribution” in 26 U.S.C. § 72(r)
  • interpretation of whether nontaxable “contributions” included income tax paid on plaintiffs’ benefits limited to whether plaintiffs had received benefits equivalent to “their contributions to the Railroad Retirement Account.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norris, Hall, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.