William McNeil v. Michael P. Lane, Michael O'leary, and Jack Boles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim based on living in a cell near asbestos- covered pipes for ten months because he did not plead “facts sufficient to establish that he was exposed to unreasonably high levels of asbestos”
• “Obduracy and wantonness rather than inadvertence or mere negligence characterize conduct prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.”
• “Obduracy and wantonness rather than inadvertence or mere negligence characterize conduct prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.”
• “Exposure to moderate levels of asbestos is a common fact of contemporary life and cannot, under contemporary standards, be considered cruel and unusual.”
• “Exposure to moderate levels of asbestos is a common fact of contemporary life and cannot, under contemporary standards, be considered cruel and unusual.”
• “Obduracy and wantonness rather than inadvertence or mere negligence characterize conduct prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).