William Mays v. Trump Indiana, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing multiple letters and evidence of oral conversations collectively to determine whether a contract was sufficiently definite to be enforced under Indiana law
• reviewing multiple letters and evidence of oral conversations collectively to determine whether a contract was sufficiently definite to be enforced under Indiana law
• reviewing multiple letters and evidence of oral conversations collectively to determine whether a contract was sufficiently definite to be enforced under Indiana law
• “the existence or nonexistence of a contract turns on whether material terms are missing”
• an agreement to agree is not a binding contract under Indiana law
• an agreement to agree is not a binding contract under Indiana law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).