William Lanier v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

The Petitioner, William Lanier, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, wherein he challenged his jury conviction for premeditated first degree murder. On appeal, the Petitioner alleges that his two attorneys provided ineffective assistance of counsel relating to the following: (1) original counsel's investigation and preservation of an alibi witness's testimony (2) trial counsel's investigation and presentation of a third-party defense at trial (3) trial counsel's decision to call or not call certain witnesses (4) trial counsel's failure to object to false or prejudicial testimony and statements by the State in closing (5) trial counsel's failure to impeach a witness's reason for changing her statement (6) trial counsel's failure to request a special jury instruction (7) trial counsel's failure to object to testimony about a theft ring and counsel's eliciting testimony about the same and (8) original counsel's failure to argue the motion to dismiss for lack of corpus delicti. The Petitioner also requests a new post-conviction hearing because the post-conviction court failed to make findings of fact related to two of his issues. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.