William L Quint III v. Perla Maria Quint

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment inappropriate where factual disputes exist over degree of impairment compared with perception thereof
• declining to apply “conclusive effect to either the job description or [the employer’s]' judgment as to whether heavy lifting is essential to [plaintiffs] job”
• whether a particular function is essential ‘is a factual determination that must be made on a case by case basis [based upon] all relevant evidence.’”
• “[T]he job 3 description is not . . . incontestable evidence that unassisted patient lifting is an essential function of [a nurse’s] job.”
• “whether a particular function is essential ‘is a factual determination that must be made on a case by case basis [based upon] all relevant evidence.’ ”
• “[A]n employer who fails to engage in the interactive process runs a serious risk that it will erroneously overlook an opportunity to accommodate a statutorily disabled employee, and thereby violate the ADA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).