William L. Albright v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Commissioner must show “substantial evidence of improvement in [the claimant’s] condition” to depart from prior, more favorable RFC
• clarifying , 820 F.2d 1391 (4th Cir. 1987), and explaining how findings from a previously adjudicated disability claim should be evaluated in a subsequent claim
• interpreting Lively v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 820 F.2d 1391 (4th Cir. 1987)
• interpreting Lively v. Secretary of HHS, 820 F.2d 1391 (4th Cir. 1987)
• noting Plaintiff’s “mild pain during the physical exam of his right shoulder”
• “Absent such evidence, however, common sense and logic dictated that Lively's physical condition was unlikely to have improved significantly within two weeks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).