William Kilburn, Jr., and Lora Kilburn v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the Supreme Court in Anderson [v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 572, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985
• “[Plaintiff] next argues that, because the district court adopted the defendant’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, we should more closely scrutinize its factual findings. We disagree.”
• “[Plaintiff] next argues that, because the district court adopted the defendant’s findings of facts and conclusions of law, we should more closely scrutinize its factual findings. We disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).