· 7/15/1996
William Keith Litzenberger v. United States
Citations
- 89 F.3d 818
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17404
- 1996 WL 392556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to timely contest an administrative forfeiture waived the opportunity to assert an Eighth Amendment claim in a judicial forum
- failure to pursue judicial challenge to forfeiture constitutes waiver of Eighth Amendment excessive fine claim under the Little Tucker Act
- failure to pursue judicial challenge to 23 forfeiture constitutes waiver of Eighth Amendment excessive fine claim under the Little Tucker A c t
- “The Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive fines is [an] example of available substantive arguments” for why property should not have been forfeited
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Plager, Clevenger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.