Skip to main content
· 7/15/1996

William Keith Litzenberger v. United States

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 818
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17404
  • 1996 WL 392556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to timely contest an administrative forfeiture waived the opportunity to assert an Eighth Amendment claim in a judicial forum
  • failure to pursue judicial challenge to forfeiture constitutes waiver of Eighth Amendment excessive fine claim under the Little Tucker Act
  • failure to pursue judicial challenge to 23 forfeiture constitutes waiver of Eighth Amendment excessive fine claim under the Little Tucker A c t
  • “The Eighth Amendment prohibition against excessive fines is [an] example of available substantive arguments” for why property should not have been forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Plager, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.