William K. Murray v. Michael Groose and Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that failure to apply dual-motivation when court found that strikes were not made purely on racial grounds \might\ be error
• upholding strike of potential jurors whose “relatives . . . had been charged with or convicted of crimes,” which led prosecutor to believe “that they would be ‘defendant’s jurors’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).