Skip to main content
· 8/31/2004

William K. McMahon v. Gary Hodges, Warden, Gowanda Correctional Facility, and the Attorney General of the State of New York

Citations

  • 382 F.3d 284
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18365
  • 2004 WL 1926018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judge’s statement that defendant would likely be convicted given evidence at co-defendant’s trial did not require recusal
  • “Although federal judges are prohibited from participating in plea bargaining, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, this blanket prohibition does not apply to state judges.”
  • “Although federal judges are prohibited from participating in plea bargaining, this blanket prohibition does not apply to state judges.”
  • even though “the trial judge had undoubtedly formed opinions about [the defendant’s] likely guilt during the course of [a co- conspirator’s] trial at which the judge presided,” recusal was not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Sack, Wexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.