William Jeremy Salter v. Glenn Albert Kirby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that not all tariff interpretations require consideration of the “underlying cost allocation” factors discussed in Western Pacific
• holding that the interest provision of 28 U.S.C. $ 1961 relates only to interest recoverable on a judgment itself and has nothing to do with the question of whether prejudgment interest shall be allowed as part of the compensation awarded to make the injured party whole
• allowance of prejudgment interest on a claim under the Interstate Commerce Act is question of federal law, but reference should be made to state law
• § 1961 inapplicable to the question of whether prejudgment interest is a proper element of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).