William James Coffman v. State of Michigan and Michigan Army National Guard, United States Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cited with approval in Baldwin and stating that Rehabilitation Act does not apply to uniformed members of the armed forces
• “Consistent with the reasoning in Chappell, courts of appeals have consistently refused to extend statutory remedies available to civilians to uniformed members of the armed forces absent a clear direction from Congress to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).