Skip to main content
· 2/10/1995

William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense v. Martin Marietta Corporation

Citations

  • 47 F.3d 1134
  • 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,748
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485
  • 1995 WL 54028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a FAR implements a CAS, the sole task in is to determine the CAS Board’s intent when it promulgated the CAS
  • looking to the illustrations and preamble accompanying the CAS as evidence of CASB intent
  • considering preambles and illustrative examples published by the CAS Board accompanying the CAS
  • There is “no reason to believe the CASB would publish incomplete, and possibly misleading, illustrations.”
  • court’s task in interpreting meaning of FAR provisions implementing the Cost Accounting Standards is to ascertain the CAS Board’s intended meaning
  • interpreting FAR 52.230-3 and 52.230-4 and the CAS clauses incorporated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Smith, Mayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.