William J. Manning, Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc. v. Energy Conversion Devices, Inc., Stanford R. Ovshinsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court order and rejecting argument that it “improperly expand[ed] the scope of the settlement agreement because . . . . district court’s factual finding as to what [was] meant by the term ‘parties’ was not clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).