Skip to main content
· 5/31/2000

William J. Kerin, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 218 F.3d 185
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here the decision to initiate or defend a lawsuit was meritless and made for improper purposes, a fee award may be proper.”
  • “[T]he government’s position was ‘substantially justified’ if it had ‘a reasonable basis both in law and in fact.’” (quoting Pierce, 487 U.S. at 563)
  • “General characterizations of the nature of the losing party’s behavior, unaccompanied by specific references to bad faith conduct, are not enough”
  • “The district court therefore has the discretion to award fees for the entire litigation where the claims are inextricably intertwined and involve a common core of facts or are based on related legal theories.” (alteration omitted)
  • rate applies to all cases commenced on or after March 29, 1996
  • quoting, in turn, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.