William J. Carter v. United States Department of Commerce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that without such “tangible evidence” “the court should not question the veracity of agency submissions”
• stating that “[w]ithholding information to prevent speculative harm” is contrary to FOIA’s pro-disclosure policy
• stating that \[w]ithholding information to prevent speculative harm\ is contrary to FOIA's pro-disclosure policy
• stating that “[w]ithholding information to prevent speculative harm” is contrary to FOIA’s pro-disclosure policy
• “when the requested documents ‘are few in number and of short length,’ in camera review may save time and money”
• “[W]hen the requested documents ‘are few in number and of short length,’ in camera review may save time and money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).