William Henry Hogencamp v. Lee County Board of Education of Lee County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the City’s contribution of money in the amount of 2.74% of the County board’s budget did not support a finding of substantial interest
• deeming city taxpayers’ contribution of 2.74% of county school board’s budget “insufficient by itself to create a substantial interest in the city residents” justifying their participation in county school board elections
• deeming city taxpayers’ contribution of 2.74% of county school board’s budget “insufficient by itself to create a substantial interest in the city residents” justifying their participation in county school board elections
• city votes had decided three of the last five elections for the county school board
• the district court accepted expert testimony that city residents provided 2.74% of the county board of education’s budget, a figure which the court of appeals found insufficient to create a substantial interest in the city residents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).