William H. Tietjen v. United States Veterans Administration Thomas K. Turnage, Administrator of Veteran's Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substance of complaint sought review of benefits determination, despite characterization as a constitutional challenge
• holding substance of complaint sought review of benefits determination, despite characterization as a constitutional challenge
• construing section 511’s pre- decessor to foreclose all review of claim that VA violated due process by ignoring its own regulations
• finding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the appellant’s claims, even though they were brought as constitutional challenges, because the substance of the appellant’s claims required review of a VA decision on a question of law or fact regarding the appellant’s benefits
• stating that 38 U.S.C. § 211(a), now § 511(a
• affirming district court 3 dismissal under § 211(a) of challenge to benefits determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).