William H. Davis v. Txo Production Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party could pursue appeal where district court dismissed claim in original complaint and defendant failed to replead claim in amended complaint because requiring party to re-plead claim that district court had already dismissed is too \formalistic\
• noting it is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect
• “[I]t is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “It 8 is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.”
• “It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.”
• “It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).