· 11/18/1998
William H. Brady v. The Credit Recovery Company, Inc. And Leslie A. Clark
Citations
- 160 F.3d 64
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30642
- 1998 WL 789185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- comparing section 1692g(b) to 1692e(8) in deciding whether 1692e(8) requires a writing to dispute a debt
- recognizing this general principle of statutory construction
- “[T]he plain language of § 1962e(8) requires debt collectors to communicate the disputed status of a debt if the debt collector ‘knows or should know’ that the debt is disputed.”
- viewing disputed language in context of other statutory sections
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.