William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “in the absence of direct evidence that the employer considered age to be significant, an age difference of six years or less between an employee and a replacement is not significant”
• explaining that bright-line rule “does not encroach on our precedent holding that eight years can be a significant age difference”
• explaining that bright-line rule “does not encroach on our precedent holding that eight years can be a significant age difference”
• explaining that bright-line rule “does not encroach on our precedent holding that eight years can be a significant age difference”
• stating that, in age discrimination cases, the protected class includes all workers at least 40 years old
• explaining that an age difference of ten or more years is sufficiently substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).