William Golding v. Steamer C. Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that customizing dishes for customers, offering menu suggestions, and assisting in creating the menus did not demonstrate that sushi chef’s primary duty required invention, imagination, originality or talent as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).