William F. Curtin v. Office of Personnel Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board has discretion to make evidentiary rulings in the course of proceedings before it
• holding that the Board has discretion to make evidentiary rulings in the course of proceedings before it
• holding that if an abuse of discretion did- occur, the petitioner must prove that the error caused substantial harm or prejudice which could have affected the outcome of the case
• explaining that we do not overturn the Board on evidentiary matters “unless an abuse of discre- tion is clear and is harmful”
• reviewing interlocutory rulings by the Board including rulings on mo- tions to compel
• “Proce- dural matters relative to discovery and evidentiary issues fall within the sound discretion of the board and its offi- cials.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).