· 10/8/1999
Federal Case
Citations
- 193 F.3d 1010
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 25028
- 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 83
- 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating district court's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.