Skip to main content
· 3/19/1963

William Eugene Swift v. United States

Citations

  • 314 F.2d 860
  • 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not prejudicial when used to counter defendant’s argument that, since codefendants did not know merchandise was stolen, defendant did not. know

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murrah, Pickett, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.