· 3/19/1963
William Eugene Swift v. United States
Citations
- 314 F.2d 860
- 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not prejudicial when used to counter defendant’s argument that, since codefendants did not know merchandise was stolen, defendant did not. know
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murrah, Pickett, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.