William E. Dugan v. R.J. Corman Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we review de novo a district court’s interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement that is clear as written
• noting that “boilerplate will sometimes be irrelevant to the document in which it has been unthinkingly inserted”
• noting that “boilerplate will sometimes be irrelevant to the document in which it has been unthinkingly inserted”
• noting that contribution report language was “weak evidence” of the employer’s obligations under the CBA
• noting that there is no “I didn’t read it” defense to breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).