Skip to main content
· 9/9/1994

William Douglas Carter v. William T. Burch Vernon Beamer, and John R. Isom Jeffrey Brown

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 257
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24396
  • 1994 WL 485056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absolute immunity protects a prosecutor from liability for failing to give defense counsel materially exculpatory evidence
  • holding that a prosecutor is shielded by absolute immunity when deciding whether or when to turn over exculpatory information
  • holding that a prosecutor is shielded by absolute immunity when deciding sities or when to turn over exculpatory information
  • holding that prosecutor’s decision to withhold exculpatory evidence was protected from suit by prosecutorial immunity
  • holding that prosecutors are absolutely immune 22 for alleged Brady violations because the decision of whether to disclose evidence is indisputably a prosecutorial function
  • concluding that a judge’s findings in a different proceeding should be excluded under Rule 403 because it is likely a jury would “place[] undue weight on such evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Williams, Erwin, Middle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.