William Dilworth v. Underwood Dudley, Robert G. Bottoms, and Donald J. Albers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering statements in a \work of scholarship\ and stating that \judges are not well equipped to resolve academic controversies\ and the appropriate remedy is \the publication of a rebuttal\
• considering the context of a “work of scholarship” and stating that “judges are not well equipped to resolve academic controversies”
• considering the context of a \work of scholarship\ and stating that \judges are not well equipped to resolve academic controversies\
• considering statements in a “work of scholarship” and stating that “judges are not well equipped to resolve academic controversies” and the appropriate remedy is “the publication of a rebuttal”
• discussing the criticism and rough competition of the marketplace that comes with publication
• “Among the terms or epithets that have been held (all in the cases we’ve cited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).