William D. Witt, Iii, Cross-Appellant v. Norfe, Inc., Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was inconsistent for jury to find product not defective for purposes of strict liability, and yet that it was negligently designed
• finding that shower door was negligently designed was inconsistent with findings that shower door was not defective
• “Because these findings are irreconcilably contradictory, we must remand for a new trial on the issue of liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).