William D. Harden v. US Bank, N.A., as Trustee, Successor-In-Interest to Bank of America, N.A., Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court considered a lower sentencing range despite the fact that the court “did not comment on the guideline ranges that would apply . . . without enhancement”
• finding New York’s attempted manslaughter statute broader than generic manslaughter based only on its text without resort to New York caselaw
• finding New York’s attempted manslaughter statute broader than generic manslaughter based only on its text without resort to New York caselaw
• finding remand unnecessary where court considered correct and incorrect ranges, imposed sentence, and stated: “this is the sentence that I would impose in any event”
• finding no reasonable probability of different sentence despite erroneous enhancement where district court stated that even if Guidelines calculation were wrong, “this is the sentence that I would impose in any event”
• same where , court stated it believed its range was correct but would apply the same sentence regardless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).