Skip to main content
· 2/2/1994

William D. Armstrong v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 970
  • 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1127
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1627
  • 1994 WL 27255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that attorneys’ 16 fees under the FDCPA are generally calculated using the 17 lodestar method
  • noting that the relevant community is the forum in which the court 16 sits
  • \[R]easonable diligence does not require that the IRS send duplicate notices to every address of which it has knowledge.\
  • “[R]easonable diligence does not require that the IRS send duplicate notices to every address of which it has knowledge.”
  • “A notice of deficiency is valid, even if it is not received by the taxpayer, if it is mailed to the taxpayer’s ‘last known address’”
  • federal courts lack jurisdiction to review BOP’s individualized 16 Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program determinations made pursuant to statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, McWilliams, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.