William Cox v. Daniel McBride

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoner’s petition challenging additional two years on prisoner’s original sentence as a result of the decision of the prison disciplinary board is not subject to section 2244(d)(1)
• reversing grant of motion to dismiss § 2254 petition challenging prison disciplinary conviction
• “[T]he custody he is challenging, as distinct from the custody that confers federal jurisdiction, is the additional two years of prison that he must serve as the result of the ‘judgment’ not of a state court but of the prison disciplinary board.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).