William Chavis v. Clayton County School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district court did not err in refusing to address a new theory raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not properly amended the complaint with respect to such theory
• noting that district court did not err in refusing to address a new theory raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not properly amended the complaint with respect to such theory
• noting that district court did not err in refusing to address a new theory raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not properly amended the complaint with respect to such theory
• refusing to address a new theory-raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not amended the complaint
• refusing to address a new theory raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not properly amended the complaint
• refusing to address a new theory raised during summary judgment because the plaintiff had not properly amended the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).