William Carter Co. v. Castellano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Ripeness becomes an issue when a case is anchored in future events that may not occur as anticipated, or at all.”
• “Because we believe that each group of plaintiffs presents different concerns in regard to the doctrine[] of standing . . . we will treat each group separately”
• “Although in regard to criminal statutes, courts are wary of . . . intervening prior to prosecution and foreshortening the prosecutor’s action, courts have allowed pre- enforcement review of a statute with criminal penalties.”
• “We believe a federal court should not intervene and determine whether a statute enacted by Congress is unconstitutionally vague on its face before the agency with rulemaking authority has had an opportunity to interpret the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).